should also keep pace with the

Recently, the frozen food brand company, three missing, Wan Chai Ferry Pier have "let the cat out of the bag": sampling and Staphylococcus aureus in foods containing health hazard. Push the law enforcement responsibilities and related accountability in public questioning and enterprises in response to the game, to freeze the new national standard cause for concern. According to this new national standards, detection of Staphylococcus aureus bacteria shift from qualitative to quantitative, in other words, is to allowCheck out a small amount of Staphylococcus aureus in food, and the standards have been a number of companies quoted or even become a shield to prove qualified products. In the food security situation remains serious today, food safety standards are lower and lower? How to guarantee food safety? Interests of the consumers who will? Face the public on the new national standard "reverse" questioned by Health Department said that new standards thanOld low standard of misreading, new standards with international standards, more in line with international food Microbe sampling requirements. Whether the standard scientific and reasonable, I believe that through rational serious discussions, there will be a final answer. However, whenever a food safety incident, the public tends to eyes focused on "food safety standard", it is food for thought: should have a neutral objective safety criteria swtor power leveling, asWhat has raised public criticism to question? If food safety standards have lost credibility, food safety and defense should from built up? Any standard, is a product of the times, should also keep pace with the, with the requirements of the times dovetails, and adapted to the development phase. However, one cannot avoid the fact is that behind the frequent incidents of food safety, food management in China standards updateLagging behind, some standards before long stop, twenty or thirty years without change. In fact, many food safety incidents occurred in recent years, are relevant here. Of course, over the years, food safety standards are not fully "remain firm". Many standard argument back on amendments. However, the development of these new standards, often as a general question. The reason is simple: as the standardAbility to develop a professional participant needs, this restriction into the relevant departments and enterprises, experts of "shut the habit". Such standard-setting process, not only deprived the public of the right, the right to participate, also gave the public a "Maoni" conjecture of space. Over the years, whenever the public question the food safety standards are too low, there is always a voice called for standard-setting and elegantConditions apply. This view is not wrong in a strict sense, but sometimes it seems irrelevant. In fact, no one knows a bite to eat in a fat man the old republic power leveling, will also respect the Chinese "developing" a reality. Is unacceptable to the public, from melamine incident to lean events, many food safety standards already and "State" has nothing to do, the development of China should abandon the backwardness of these foodsSafety standards, but in reality these outdated standards did "peach still smiling spring breeze". Therefore, in the face of public concerns about food safety, and revitalize the credibility of the food safety standards, the departments concerned can not just as a simple response, but it should be thinking about development of food safety standards is already behind the times? Standard-setting is open and transparent? Whether the right to develop was "minority"," A small number of enterprises "abduction? ����Only similar questions have been answered, and food safety standards don't become public anxiety, can also become a food safety firmly "firewall". Gold-line statement: Gold-line reproduced above, does not indicate that confirm the description for investor use only and does not constitute investment advice. Investor actions accordingly, riskTAM.